books transfer power from publishers

shafi321@gmail.

Or could it be that, when newspapers created their online versions, executives expected that, after reading the news on the internet, people would rush to the newsstands the next day in order to confirm what they had already read? The despair of the mainstream media is fair. We all know that business does not tolerate naivety. From the outside, you get the feeling that there is much more involved. Is it worth letting technology companies control so much content and so many fronts? Does the digitization of books and e- to distribution companies? What about advertising, which is rapidly migrating from traditional media to the online world, whose biggest


players, Google and Facebook, do not pay BV? The naive person here is Wuhan Mobile Number List anyone who thinks there is only one problem. Let's wait for scenes from the next chapters. The Mourning of Traditional Media There is a practical way to notice problems in certain areas by analyzing the reactions of their major influencers. I have a crazy theory which is that if you can see signs of grief in these reactions, an end is near, or has already happened. According to Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, the grief that follows any loss that has occurred or is imminent takes us through phases: Denial, Anger, Bargain, Depression, and Acceptance. If we can identify reactions that fit into these phases, this could prove





my hypothesis that the end of the model is imminent, do you agree? Let’s use Journalism and Advertising as an example. These issues merge, as Advertising still relies heavily on traditional media. No one in their right mind would say that Journalism will end or that Advertising is dead. Now, anyone who doesn't realize that current models are doomed to fail is not paying attention to the big picture . It turns out that agents, both in Advertising and representatives of the mainstream media, in desperation, insist on the message that relevance remains the same.